Uriel Fanelli A few days ago that I was part of a dedicated post on his blog (thanks to the Anonymous who pointed out to me). As this took me a lot 'of contacts, I want to return the favor.
http://www.wolfstep.cc/2010/09/il-mercato-dei-paraculi.html
I agree 100% with his analysis of the seven that make up tricks to sell the poor footage of the newsroom's editorial today, and I think Amanda should experiment to confirm this.
Question: if the experiment Amanda is in total agreement with what he says, chemminchia Uriel Fanelli want from me then? ^____^
Reading here and there on his blog, I suspect that the boy is so in contrast to finish up everything to be in contrast with the counter (yes, count as double negative). So, if you think like him but you say the same thing before him and more effectively (the young person is awake but does not have the gift of synthesis), Vittorio Sgarbi reacts like a transvestite at a party when he learns that c 'is another of him dressed as Veronica Lake.
Returning to his post, Uriel Fanelli takes an I share fully the mechanisms of choice for publishers, but also tells of crap.
Meanwhile, according to him want to become a publishing event. Too bad that I did not write no book-publishing world on the complaint, nor do I intend to write, but just a quick post on my blog.
Then, on the first and last names makes it a bit 'too easy. It is probably ignorant on the subject, because the example that the thief is a light tight. The thief has in fact committed a crime, Mrs. Xyzxyz not. I do not know if Uriel Fanelli is deliberately confusing judicial proceedings and "complaint" as a journalist is either very confused or in bad faith because it is trivially obvious that they are two different things, being the first given to the Prosecutor's Office while the second is addressed to the reading public and with very different purposes.
As I said, I did not put the literary agent's name I mentioned it to reveal the contents of private correspondence and telephone calls is a crime. Also, if I put in, the lady could always deny everything.
Whether then confirmed or denied that he had all the Lady Xyzxyz could easily have sued for defamation, because Italian law does not make any difference if what you said is true or false (art. 596 Criminal Code). To defame someone sufficiente nuocere alla sua reputazione, anche dicendo cose vere. Non puoi commettere invece pubblica diffamazione quando vai a denunciare un presunto ladro, perché alla denuncia manca la caratteristica di essere pubblica . Al limite, puoi commettere il reato di calunnia nel caso in cui il presunto ladro risulti poi essere innocente, ma per la calunnia va dimostrato il dolo , ovvero il fatto che tu abbia ingiustamente accusato un innocente sapendolo innocente.
A proposito:
http://www.wolfstep.cc/2010/09/nascondere-i-problemi.html
^___^
0 comments:
Post a Comment